Mindcoolness

A Cool Mind for a Full Life

  • Blog
  • Glossary
  • About
  • Contact

What Is the True Meaning of Justice?

January 6, 2021 Dominic Reichl

Justice cannot be objective because it is rooted in subjective intuition and opinion. But neither can justice be subjective because then it would lose its usefulness as a concept (if everyone means something different when speaking of justice, it’s useless to talk about it in the first place).

Therefore, lying somewhere between objective and subjective, justice is intersubjective. The true meaning of justice is: what a people deems to be fair.

What justice means in practice can thus be different for different peoples, whereas some principles may be universal (consider the declaration of human rights or anthropological findings on human universals for some candidate principles).

In reality, however, there does not exist any people that unanimously agrees on what is just. So what is justice when there is no consensus on it?

Among the many possible and problematic methods to reach a consensus, the least problematic appears to be going by the majority opinion. And since majority opinion is determined by a democratic process, justice is fundamentally democratic.

Now, with justice thus defined, we have to reconsider how we make moral and political arguments. For example, are you in favor of redistributing wealth and income because you find it just? Well, if a majority vote says otherwise, it is unjust and you are wrong in calling it “just.” This also implies that you will have to find better arguments than merely stating, “Because it is (not) just.”

The same holds true for the prioritization of values. Is freedom a higher good than security? Are more regulations better than less? Is homogeneity favorable to diversity? As long as we cannot predict the future to carry out the Utilitarian calculus, the answer to these questions lies in the democratic will of a people—and certainly not in some idle philosophical fantasy of justice, since the scope of philosophy ends with the formal definition.

In conclusion, questions about justice and political values can only be settled through the practice of democracy, not through ethical theory.

Read More

  • The Merits of Direct Democracy
  • Why Should We Care About Ethics?
  • Against Morality & Ethics
  • Will Precedes Morality
  • 6 Reasons Why People Use Moral Language
  • Alain De Benoist’s Critique of Human Rights

Blog ethics

Latest Post

Newsletter

Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.

Copyright © 2023 • Content Disclaimer • Privacy Policy • Affiliate Disclosure • About
Dear reader, this website uses cookies for analytical purposes. We'll assume you're ok with it, but you can opt-out if you wish.
OK Give me more information.
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT